Why? Well, when (and it's when, not if, if you work in motion pictures), the graphics card dies on a 2013 Mac, you have to send the whole unit in to get refurbished. When the original T3 Macbook Pro came out in 2016, there wasn't anything to really make T3 worth it you mostly just used an adapter and T2 accessories.Between the Blackmagic eGPU and the wave of affordable Thunderbolt 3 SSDs that are hitting the streets, there are some real benefits to the little connector.Despite the existence of the 2013 Mac Pro "R2D2," the older 2006-2010 "Cheese Grater" Mac Pro is still dominant in post. No, it's the increasing benefits of Thunderbolt 3. We've owned Mac Minis over the years, both in our office as a "mini-server" and at home as a media player and all around backup system, and while we've always liked them, we've never thought of them as our main system.What Graphics Cards are Compatible with macOS 10.15 SAPPHIRE Radeon PULSE RX 580 8GB GDDR5 SAPPHIRE Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition MSI Gaming Radeon RX 560 128-.However, as Thunderbolt 3 finally matures, we might consider the new Mac Mini to be a real contender as a "main machine" for even demanding post users, like colorists.The biggest thing that makes the Mac Mini exciting isn't even the Mac Mini itself, though with its new Space Gray color scheme and fully integrated design it's an attractive little box. While we wait on the long-rumored 2019 Mac Pro and what wonders it might offer (Thunderbolt 3 AND USB-C ports! PCI card slots!), right now, in January 2019, we spent a few weeks testing the Mac Mini. It is compatible with high performance GPU cards, hardware control panels such as the DaVinci Resolve Micro, Mini and Advanced panels, and even third party panels from Tangent, JL Cooper Eclipse and more.Apple has been working very hard to get back into the good graces of professional users, with a huge wave of activity in 2018 letting us know that pros are a high priority.10gig has been around for a while but has always been too pricy. While many post houses run on fiber, many "indie" post houses and production companies run on copper, 1gb ethernet to connect machines and move files around. Of course, you might still cook the internal Intel integrated graphics, but that is far, far less likely if you are pushing the bulk of graphics processing out to the external processor.On top of that, for a small fee, you can upgrade the system to 10gig ethernet. I could see busier production facilities keeping a spare eGPU sitting around, and since you could plug up to four of them directly into a Mini, you can have a graphics powerhouse and an array of "backup" graphics cards ready to go at any moment.Of course, the new 2019 Mac Pro will have T2 (or T3, maybe) chips and fast H.265 encoding as well. On small files, that isn't a big deal, but if you do a lot of exports or work on longer projects, that really adds up.On the new Mac Mini, a machine 1/3 the cost of the Mac Pro at base specs and something like 1/5th the price in top spec? A Mac Pro H.264 render that took 58 seconds now runs at 23 seconds on the Mac Mini and the H.265 render took precisely the same amount of time, at 23 seconds.That's because there is hardware acceleration built into the T2 for H.265. On a traditional Mac Pro (2013, 6-Core, D700 graphics), it took 1:43 to render our test prores file to H265 time compared to only 58 seconds for H.264. While H.265 (otherwise known as HEVC) hasn't become the dominant replacement for H.264 quite yet, it is coming, and it does offer substantial image quality benefits, or even slightly, smaller files sizes compared to the market-dominant H.264.Why isn't it more common? Because it's a massive time eater to render. We do wish they would space out the T3 connectors a bit further apart: thumb driver and adapters are wider than power cables.The other big thing that makes the Mac Mini so appealing is the inclusion of the same T2 chip seen in the Macbook Pro and iMac Pro, that is used to speed up H.265 renders. That's actually one of the first questions I had for Apple when playing with the machine, and the Apple expert I was talking to pointed out that they had it set up that way at the moment.
Best Mini Video Card Free For Other1 x Gigabit Ethernet Port, Upgradeable to 10 Gig GHz Intel Core i7 Six-Core and Four-Core processors Even if the 2019 Mac Pro is everything we dream it will be, the Mac Mini might still be the smart option for filmmakers this year. Since Apple makes both, they can presumably optimize in a fashion that no third-party software can match.It's small. The same renders on the top spec Macbook Pro took about 20 seconds, but of course, that is a dual graphics card machine that can cost twice what the Mac Mini will run you.We compared Compresso and Media Encoder, with both showing good times on the Mini, but unsurprisingly Compressor had a slight speed edge (20 vs. Even better, by putting HEVC encoding on the T2, your CPU stays relatively free for other tasks.![]() Hopefully Apple won't forget about the pros for another 6 years. Considering a decently spec'd iMac Pro cost $7500+ the Mini seems to be a good option for the next 3-5 years. I have a sneaking suspicion that the power supply is reaching the end of it's life based on the types of load crashes I'm experiencing.I've already invested in high quality monitors and I have to work on the road occasionally which involves hefting this monster and it's peripherals-big plus to the mini for size even with an eGPU which easily fit in a pelican!While I would very much prefer upgrading to a truly modular 2019 Mac Pro, I'm just out of options at this point. It doesn't handle complex AE projects well (talking dozens of comps and lots of alpha), and 4K pushes it pretty hard. T2 security chip with HEVC optimized encodingI'm currently working off a maxed out 2012 cheese grater:GTX1080 only because the internal power supply couldn't handle the TiWhile it is still a very powerful machine it chokes on VR and h265 workflows. ![]() I was also confused because I just bought an eGPU to bypass my overheating and glitching D700s in my Mac Pro and during that process learned that the eGPU can't perform at the level of an internal card because the internal cards are on the PCI x16 slot while Thunderbolt is PCI x4. Here are the specs I want to get for the Mac Mini 2018:3.2GHz 6‑core 8th‑generation Intel Core i7 (Turbo Boost up to 4.6GHz)-Crucial 32GB DDR4 2400 MHz SO-DIMM Memory Module Kit for Mac (2 x 16GB)-Satechi Aluminum Slim Wireless Keyboard with Numeric Keypad*Continue using my ASUS MX27AQ monitor or buy an LG 4K UHD 27UD88-W 27" LED-Lit Monitor with USB Type-C*Continue using my Logitech MX Master MouseWhat do you think? Is this enough for a guy like me who is saving money and just getting started trying to become a professional Motion Designer/Video Editor?I looked up the video you mentioned and he concluded by saying DON'T expect the new Mac mini to perform at an iMac or MacBook Pro level. I use most of the programs in Adobe Creative Cloud but I mainly use After Effects 2018/19 & Premiere Pro 2018/19 is a close second. Download games ukts bus mod indonesiaAnd the D700s were considered mid-range cards even way back in 2013 when they came out! The techs explained it's because of the PCI slot. In tests, my eGPU setup only matches ONE of the D700 cards in Resolve NR tests, and only half when both cards are selected. Mine is a Sonnet Breakaway box with a Vega Frontier installed (I think essentially the same as the Vega 64 in the iMac Pro, as they're both V64 and have 16gb vs the 8gb of the "Vega 64".
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorMiguel ArchivesCategories |